<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sanity Prevails.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Athlon 64 3500+ v. Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz: Matlab at Σπιτάκι</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-21815</link>
		<dc:creator>Athlon 64 3500+ v. Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz: Matlab at Σπιτάκι</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-21815</guid>
		<description>[...] budget έχει αναλωθεί σ&#8217; έναν PowerBook 12&#8243; και μετά έναν MeromBook Pro 15.4&#8243;. Από την εποχή του πρώτου δεν έχω πολυανοίξει τον desktop [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] budget έχει αναλωθεί σ&#8217; έναν PowerBook 12&#8243; και μετά έναν MeromBook Pro 15.4&#8243;. Από την εποχή του πρώτου δεν έχω πολυανοίξει τον desktop [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix.org &#124; The Rotten MBPs</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-4209</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix.org &#124; The Rotten MBPs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-4209</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m in London for a few days and I couldn&#8217;t avoid paying a visit to the Regent Street Apple Store. I&#8217;ve been in the market for a laptop for some time now and while my plan since late last year has been to get a Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro (C2D MBP), as soon as they were released, reason prevailed and I decided to wait until the first few months of next year to get one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m in London for a few days and I couldn&#8217;t avoid paying a visit to the Regent Street Apple Store. I&#8217;ve been in the market for a laptop for some time now and while my plan since late last year has been to get a Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro (C2D MBP), as soon as they were released, reason prevailed and I decided to wait until the first few months of next year to get one. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moga</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-2939</link>
		<dc:creator>moga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-2939</guid>
		<description>I never had second thoughts about Apple&#039;s excellent reputation (I grew up as a kid with an Apple LC II ..) but price was a major concern ! 
Thanx for the advice :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never had second thoughts about Apple&#8217;s excellent reputation (I grew up as a kid with an Apple LC II ..) but price was a major concern !<br />
Thanx for the advice :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-2927</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-2927</guid>
		<description>Hey moga! To be honest I&#039;m not sure what your question is. I don&#039;t think that getting an iPod now is risky -- on the contrary, the new nano is essentially a shrunk mini (aluminum shell), the video has been out for a long time and the shuffle is just pointless unless you only listen to music when you jog :)

Pricing is another thing. I&#039;d get an iPod because I think that overall Apple makes good products, not just because they look good. While there are sometimes faults with Apple products and especially their first revisions, Apple still  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theacsi.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=13&amp;Itemid=31&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tops&lt;/a&gt; the U.S. Customer Satisfaction Index and designs and manufactures excellent products. You hear more about them because they are leading the industry in so many ways --- and on this blog because I mostly write about them :) 

On the other hand, 80&#8364; is a significant difference in price; have you compared the two devices? Are they similar in weight, features, size, etc? Mind you that with the nano you&#039;re essentially paying for the size + design. If you were looking for value for money that&#039;s the wrong place to look. However, if you have decided to get it, I would not wait any further at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey moga! To be honest I&#8217;m not sure what your question is. I don&#8217;t think that getting an iPod now is risky &#8212; on the contrary, the new nano is essentially a shrunk mini (aluminum shell), the video has been out for a long time and the shuffle is just pointless unless you only listen to music when you jog :)</p>
<p>Pricing is another thing. I&#8217;d get an iPod because I think that overall Apple makes good products, not just because they look good. While there are sometimes faults with Apple products and especially their first revisions, Apple still  <a href="http://www.theacsi.org/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=13&#038;Itemid=31" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">tops</a> the U.S. Customer Satisfaction Index and designs and manufactures excellent products. You hear more about them because they are leading the industry in so many ways &#8212; and on this blog because I mostly write about them :) </p>
<p>On the other hand, 80&euro; is a significant difference in price; have you compared the two devices? Are they similar in weight, features, size, etc? Mind you that with the nano you&#8217;re essentially paying for the size + design. If you were looking for value for money that&#8217;s the wrong place to look. However, if you have decided to get it, I would not wait any further at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moga</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-2921</link>
		<dc:creator>moga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-2921</guid>
		<description>&quot;All in all, it seems that cosmix’s eternal advice for Macheads still stands: don’t let Steve’s RDF and the aura of new gadgets rush you into getting an Apple product as soon as it is announced. &quot;

Speaking of Apple Gadgets, I&#039;d like to hear your advice on this: I&#039;d like to purchase an IPod. I actually meant to do that last year, when the nano ones came out in stores, but then I learned they were deffective. So, I decided to wait for a while. Prices would go down, too, I thought. Now, the 4GB is worth 220euros, but am still sceptical whether it&#039;s worth it. Also, a friend of mine bought another MP3 player , 6GB storage, for 140euros. The only reason I&#039;d pay more for an IPod would be for its design and stuff. Should I wait a few months more or buy another MP3 player?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All in all, it seems that cosmix’s eternal advice for Macheads still stands: don’t let Steve’s RDF and the aura of new gadgets rush you into getting an Apple product as soon as it is announced. &#8220;</p>
<p>Speaking of Apple Gadgets, I&#8217;d like to hear your advice on this: I&#8217;d like to purchase an IPod. I actually meant to do that last year, when the nano ones came out in stores, but then I learned they were deffective. So, I decided to wait for a while. Prices would go down, too, I thought. Now, the 4GB is worth 220euros, but am still sceptical whether it&#8217;s worth it. Also, a friend of mine bought another MP3 player , 6GB storage, for 140euros. The only reason I&#8217;d pay more for an IPod would be for its design and stuff. Should I wait a few months more or buy another MP3 player?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>If you feel 768MB is enough for what you do with your iBook with Tiger, then it will probably be enough for Leopard :)

Since Intel is on a roll with multicore CPUs, and since you&#039;re going to the army, I&#039;d probably also wait if I were you, unless you manage to get some sort of placement where you&#039;ll have enough time and/or a desk job that will enable you to use your new laptop. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you feel 768MB is enough for what you do with your iBook with Tiger, then it will probably be enough for Leopard :)</p>
<p>Since Intel is on a roll with multicore CPUs, and since you&#8217;re going to the army, I&#8217;d probably also wait if I were you, unless you manage to get some sort of placement where you&#8217;ll have enough time and/or a desk job that will enable you to use your new laptop. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atma</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>atma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>Hi, I have only 768 MB of RAM so I think I&#039;ll stick with Tiger a bit longer. Thank you for the reply, I&#039;ll see what happens until April.

err shit.. I&#039;ll have to do my nationaly military service in May.. sucks.. but I have too.. so I think I&#039;ll have to wait at least another 12 months until I get another mac :-(

poor me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have only 768 MB of RAM so I think I&#8217;ll stick with Tiger a bit longer. Thank you for the reply, I&#8217;ll see what happens until April.</p>
<p>err shit.. I&#8217;ll have to do my nationaly military service in May.. sucks.. but I have too.. so I think I&#8217;ll have to wait at least another 12 months until I get another mac :-(</p>
<p>poor me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-2844</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-2844</guid>
		<description>Hey!

Leopard is expected to be faster than Tiger due to several optimisations in the kernel. I don&#039;t think support for the G4 is going to be dropped in Leopard. There&#039;s still a very large userbase with G4 machines. Make sure you have enough RAM (I&#039;d say at least 1 GB).

It&#039;s understandable that your battery has died after 2.5 years, especially if you were using the machine daily. Unfortunately, even though I moved back to Hellas in the summer of 2005, I am not at all knowledgeable about the Mac market in this country as I haven&#039;t --- and do not intend to --- purchase any Macs from Hellas under the current IMC &#039;regime&#039;. Sorry. :(

In any case, Leopard seems to be improving OS X a lot under the hood (and not so much in terms of  &#039;user&#039; features or UI) and if you&#039;re not in need of the fancy new backup etc. you could stay with Tiger for a bit longer if your machine is not up to it and you don&#039;t want to upgrade your hardware. On the other hand, I reckon that March-April will be a good time to get a new MBP/Macbook if you so wish to do :)

Take care and thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!</p>
<p>Leopard is expected to be faster than Tiger due to several optimisations in the kernel. I don&#8217;t think support for the G4 is going to be dropped in Leopard. There&#8217;s still a very large userbase with G4 machines. Make sure you have enough RAM (I&#8217;d say at least 1 GB).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s understandable that your battery has died after 2.5 years, especially if you were using the machine daily. Unfortunately, even though I moved back to Hellas in the summer of 2005, I am not at all knowledgeable about the Mac market in this country as I haven&#8217;t &#8212; and do not intend to &#8212; purchase any Macs from Hellas under the current IMC &#8216;regime&#8217;. Sorry. :(</p>
<p>In any case, Leopard seems to be improving OS X a lot under the hood (and not so much in terms of  &#8216;user&#8217; features or UI) and if you&#8217;re not in need of the fancy new backup etc. you could stay with Tiger for a bit longer if your machine is not up to it and you don&#8217;t want to upgrade your hardware. On the other hand, I reckon that March-April will be a good time to get a new MBP/Macbook if you so wish to do :)</p>
<p>Take care and thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atma</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/comment-page-1/#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>atma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/13/sanity-prevails/#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>Hello there!

How are thee? I&#039;d like to ask you a few questions about Leopard. I&#039;m thinking too of buying a new macintosh x86 based currently I&#039;m stuck with my old G4 iBook which I love!!

Will I be able to run leopard smoothly on it, or should I stick with Tiger? I&#039;m sitting on a &#039;next-generation&#039; OS anyway.. the features we have (in Tiger) since 2005 are what windows users expect to see as a bleeding edge technology in windows (s)Vista so.. 

Another thing, I live in Greece.. do you know of any store (except rainbow and resellers) that I can buy a battery and a supply cable for my iBook? It seems that after 2.5 years my battery finally died :-(

best regards,

Nice blog ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there!</p>
<p>How are thee? I&#8217;d like to ask you a few questions about Leopard. I&#8217;m thinking too of buying a new macintosh x86 based currently I&#8217;m stuck with my old G4 iBook which I love!!</p>
<p>Will I be able to run leopard smoothly on it, or should I stick with Tiger? I&#8217;m sitting on a &#8216;next-generation&#8217; OS anyway.. the features we have (in Tiger) since 2005 are what windows users expect to see as a bleeding edge technology in windows (s)Vista so.. </p>
<p>Another thing, I live in Greece.. do you know of any store (except rainbow and resellers) that I can buy a battery and a supply cable for my iBook? It seems that after 2.5 years my battery finally died :-(</p>
<p>best regards,</p>
<p>Nice blog ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
