<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/comment-page-1/#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>Tough call. I don&#039;t know, it depends what you want. Mind you that the EOS 350D has been succeeded by the 400D. Now, the 400D is on a different league to the D40 (you&#039;d compare it with the D80 not the 40), but it&#039;s also much more expensive. 

If I were to get an entry-level camera I&#039;d probably get the EOS 400D, just because I like Canon&#039;s lenses more and appreciate the sensor cleaning system. Between the 350D and the D40 however, there&#039;s a lot to think about and depends on whether you want to invest in lens equipment, blow up images to poster size or not, learn and experiment with &#039;advanced&#039; photo techniques etc. I cannot give you a definite answer. Both have pros and cons, but most probably *I* (with my criteria) would get the Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough call. I don&#8217;t know, it depends what you want. Mind you that the EOS 350D has been succeeded by the 400D. Now, the 400D is on a different league to the D40 (you&#8217;d compare it with the D80 not the 40), but it&#8217;s also much more expensive. </p>
<p>If I were to get an entry-level camera I&#8217;d probably get the EOS 400D, just because I like Canon&#8217;s lenses more and appreciate the sensor cleaning system. Between the 350D and the D40 however, there&#8217;s a lot to think about and depends on whether you want to invest in lens equipment, blow up images to poster size or not, learn and experiment with &#8216;advanced&#8217; photo techniques etc. I cannot give you a definite answer. Both have pros and cons, but most probably *I* (with my criteria) would get the Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Μαρκος</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/comment-page-1/#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Μαρκος</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>The D40 has the same price as the Canon 350D.
Which one do you think is better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D40 has the same price as the Canon 350D.<br />
Which one do you think is better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/comment-page-1/#comment-3068</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/#comment-3068</guid>
		<description>You just misunderstood the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just misunderstood the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stelios</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/comment-page-1/#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>Stelios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>&quot;And the post contradicts this where exactly? Try reading it again.&quot;....
I don&#039;t get it...
my message is definite!(at list for them who knows the Nikon D70 story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And the post contradicts this where exactly? Try reading it again.&#8221;&#8230;.<br />
I don&#8217;t get it&#8230;<br />
my message is definite!(at list for them who knows the Nikon D70 story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/comment-page-1/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nikon have gotten the message since D70!…not in D40…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And the post contradicts this where exactly? Try reading it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nikon have gotten the message since D70!…not in D40…</p></blockquote>
<p>And the post contradicts this where exactly? Try reading it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stelios</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/comment-page-1/#comment-3059</link>
		<dc:creator>Stelios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/11/16/nikon-d40/#comment-3059</guid>
		<description>Nikon have gotten the message since D70!...not in D40...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon have gotten the message since D70!&#8230;not in D40&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

