<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Favourite TextMate Themes.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cascader.co Updates &#124; Of Melon Light</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-25803</link>
		<dc:creator>Cascader.co Updates &#124; Of Melon Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/#comment-25803</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;night-time&#8221; high-contrast mode (dark background, like the Twilight theme for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;night-time&#8221; high-contrast mode (dark background, like the Twilight theme for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-14081</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/#comment-14081</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe there&#039;s any controversy based on those two links. In order to call something controversial you&#039;d need a larger sample than this, not just a bunch of guys expressing their preferences. I&#039;d say the jury is still out on this; there&#039;s nothing but personal preference and it turns out &#039;readability&#039; really depends on the reader. Some people find light-on-dark more comfortable; other&#039;s can&#039;t take it and prefer dark-on-light. Some people find Cleartype good for readability, I think it sucks in all ways possible. Mind you, this is not about æsthetics, this is about the technical aspects of readability. 
 
In this respect, I have not seen any convincing arguments in favour or against light-on-dark layouts or vice-versa. As I wrote earlier, I do believe there are æsthetic reasons for which I wouldn&#039;t use a light-on-dark layout on a number of sites, but they are just that: æsthetic. I believe good design can be either and be equally readable. Personal preferences, be they æsthetic or technical (i.e. people feeling more comfortable with dark backgrounds or vice-versa) will always exist. That does not make it controversial.

In any case, this discussion is getting a bit off-topic, so let&#039;s stop here; we can always chat about this on a relevant post :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s any controversy based on those two links. In order to call something controversial you&#8217;d need a larger sample than this, not just a bunch of guys expressing their preferences. I&#8217;d say the jury is still out on this; there&#8217;s nothing but personal preference and it turns out &#8216;readability&#8217; really depends on the reader. Some people find light-on-dark more comfortable; other&#8217;s can&#8217;t take it and prefer dark-on-light. Some people find Cleartype good for readability, I think it sucks in all ways possible. Mind you, this is not about æsthetics, this is about the technical aspects of readability. </p>
<p>In this respect, I have not seen any convincing arguments in favour or against light-on-dark layouts or vice-versa. As I wrote earlier, I do believe there are æsthetic reasons for which I wouldn&#8217;t use a light-on-dark layout on a number of sites, but they are just that: æsthetic. I believe good design can be either and be equally readable. Personal preferences, be they æsthetic or technical (i.e. people feeling more comfortable with dark backgrounds or vice-versa) will always exist. That does not make it controversial.</p>
<p>In any case, this discussion is getting a bit off-topic, so let&#8217;s stop here; we can always chat about this on a relevant post :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sugar</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-14059</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/#comment-14059</guid>
		<description>You can find out more about this controversy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200608/light_text_on_dark_background_vs_readability/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://veerle.duoh.com/blog/comments/my_view_on_light_text_on_dark_background_vs_readability/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can find out more about this controversy <a href="http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200608/light_text_on_dark_background_vs_readability/" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://veerle.duoh.com/blog/comments/my_view_on_light_text_on_dark_background_vs_readability/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-13511</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/#comment-13511</guid>
		<description>Sure, I was referring to the editor (i.e. code viewing) of course. 

What sort of controversy are you referring to? Since the advent of CSS I cannot think of any technical excuses against &#039;dark layouts&#039;, assuming someone (cares to) and follows decent usability/accessibility guidelines and accompanying stylesheets for print/other devices etc. Of course there&#039;s always the æsthetics part and I&#039;d probably be one of the first to state that a dark layout would probably be a bad idea for a corporate site for many reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, I was referring to the editor (i.e. code viewing) of course. </p>
<p>What sort of controversy are you referring to? Since the advent of CSS I cannot think of any technical excuses against &#8216;dark layouts&#8217;, assuming someone (cares to) and follows decent usability/accessibility guidelines and accompanying stylesheets for print/other devices etc. Of course there&#8217;s always the æsthetics part and I&#8217;d probably be one of the first to state that a dark layout would probably be a bad idea for a corporate site for many reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sugar</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-13509</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/#comment-13509</guid>
		<description>Light-on-dark schemes are a matter of great controversy for the web design world.

But I always secretly found it easier on the eyes for code viewing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Light-on-dark schemes are a matter of great controversy for the web design world.</p>
<p>But I always secretly found it easier on the eyes for code viewing ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-13506</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/#comment-13506</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;P.S. Light on dark, always, eh? :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Always. See what happens when you grow up using computers before the time when GUIs were commonplace? 

On a more serious note, I find light on dark easier on the eyes for those (really, really) long hours. Don&#039;t ask me why this site is light on dark though. All the previous &#039;designs&#039; were dark on white (or off-white), so I thought I&#039;d try a change and it stuck. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>P.S. Light on dark, always, eh? :)</p></blockquote>
<p>Always. See what happens when you grow up using computers before the time when GUIs were commonplace? </p>
<p>On a more serious note, I find light on dark easier on the eyes for those (really, really) long hours. Don&#8217;t ask me why this site is light on dark though. All the previous &#8216;designs&#8217; were dark on white (or off-white), so I thought I&#8217;d try a change and it stuck. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sugar</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-13505</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/12/19/my-favourite-textmate-themes/#comment-13505</guid>
		<description>Such a nice post, now that I actually bought Textmate and decided to give it a second chance!

Thanks, dearest cosmix.

P.S. Light on dark, always, eh? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a nice post, now that I actually bought Textmate and decided to give it a second chance!</p>
<p>Thanks, dearest cosmix.</p>
<p>P.S. Light on dark, always, eh? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

