<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucida Grandε.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/comment-page-1/#comment-24984</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/#comment-24984</guid>
		<description>Μπορείς να χρησιμοποιήσεις την Lucida Sans Unicode που είναι σχεδόν πανομοιότυπο και συμπεριλαμβάνεται με όλες τις εκδόσεις των Windows από την 98 και έπειτα. Δε γνωρίζω εαν η Grande διατίθεται προς πώληση, όμως σίγουρα μπορείς να τη βρείς σε μορφή TTF/OTF στο διαδίκτυο --- πρόσεξε όμως, τέτοια αντίγραφα είναι φυσικά παράνομα.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Μπορείς να χρησιμοποιήσεις την Lucida Sans Unicode που είναι σχεδόν πανομοιότυπο και συμπεριλαμβάνεται με όλες τις εκδόσεις των Windows από την 98 και έπειτα. Δε γνωρίζω εαν η Grande διατίθεται προς πώληση, όμως σίγουρα μπορείς να τη βρείς σε μορφή TTF/OTF στο διαδίκτυο &#8212; πρόσεξε όμως, τέτοια αντίγραφα είναι φυσικά παράνομα.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giorgoskz</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/comment-page-1/#comment-24983</link>
		<dc:creator>giorgoskz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 23:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/#comment-24983</guid>
		<description>χμ... άραγε μπορώ να βρω την Lucida Grande σε bold με ελληνικούς χαρακτήρες για windows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>χμ&#8230; άραγε μπορώ να βρω την Lucida Grande σε bold με ελληνικούς χαρακτήρες για windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kostis</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/comment-page-1/#comment-23544</link>
		<dc:creator>kostis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/#comment-23544</guid>
		<description>I agree with Nikos. I don&#039;t do my epsilons that way (down with the \varepsilon), but it does seem to fit the rest of the font a bit better than the original. But, eh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Nikos. I don&#8217;t do my epsilons that way (down with the \varepsilon), but it does seem to fit the rest of the font a bit better than the original. But, eh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmix</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/comment-page-1/#comment-23475</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/#comment-23475</guid>
		<description>Nikoxy: This is not about hellenism. It is also not about æsthetics (or their subjectivity). My post was mostly referring to the technical and æsthetic integrity of the glyph (from a typography standpoint). My problem with the new epsilon is not that it isn&#039;t lunate, but that it seems rushed, disproportionate and largely unfitting to be part of this beautiful font. 

By the way, the lunate epsilon is as hellenic as the open one --- they come from different eras, but they are both of hellenic origin. Oh and another thing: Please observe the language of the post when commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikoxy: This is not about hellenism. It is also not about æsthetics (or their subjectivity). My post was mostly referring to the technical and æsthetic integrity of the glyph (from a typography standpoint). My problem with the new epsilon is not that it isn&#8217;t lunate, but that it seems rushed, disproportionate and largely unfitting to be part of this beautiful font. </p>
<p>By the way, the lunate epsilon is as hellenic as the open one &#8212; they come from different eras, but they are both of hellenic origin. Oh and another thing: Please observe the language of the post when commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikoxy</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/comment-page-1/#comment-23474</link>
		<dc:creator>nikoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/#comment-23474</guid>
		<description>Χμμμ... Προτιμώ το καινούργιο epsilon.
Είναι πιο ελληνικό...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Χμμμ&#8230; Προτιμώ το καινούργιο epsilon.<br />
Είναι πιο ελληνικό&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atma</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/comment-page-1/#comment-23472</link>
		<dc:creator>atma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/11/08/the-new-lucida-grande-ugly-epsilon/#comment-23472</guid>
		<description>Okay, you are a bit paranoid on these issues, but if you call this an upgrade I fail to see differences in my 12&#039;&#039; iBook screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, you are a bit paranoid on these issues, but if you call this an upgrade I fail to see differences in my 12&#8221; iBook screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

