<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cosmix.org &#187; Patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cosmix.org/category/patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cosmix.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Microsoft lost control of VC-1</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/04/14/how-microsoft-lost-control-of-vc-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/04/14/how-microsoft-lost-control-of-vc-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pointers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/04/14/how-microsoft-lost-control-of-vc-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A two page article on The Register on how excitement over VC-1 waned and H.264 ended up ruling the current generation of video codecs. While I am not keen on trusting Microsoft with any additional power over computer technology and I am quite happy that H.264 seems to have won the battle, what&#8217;s really interesting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/04/14/how-microsoft-lost-control-of-vc-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I dare anybody to [hack into] once a month on the Windows machine.</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/02/02/i-dare-anybody-to-hack-into-once-a-month-on-the-windows-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/02/02/i-dare-anybody-to-hack-into-once-a-month-on-the-windows-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pointers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/02/02/i-dare-anybody-to-hack-into-once-a-month-on-the-windows-machine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Errr, right. Despite his &#8212; numerous &#8212; amazingly bad evaluations (e.g. the importance of the &#8216;net in the mid-1990s), his volatile opinions on important matters (e.g. patents), lack of ethics and piss-poor software, Bill Gates has time and again proven to be an important thinker when it comes to technology and its importance in society. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cosmix.org/2007/02/02/i-dare-anybody-to-hack-into-once-a-month-on-the-windows-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patently Insane</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/10/24/patently-insane/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/10/24/patently-insane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/10/24/patently-insane/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re living in Europe you might have heard of the debate on Software Patents. That is patents regarding software. This essentially equates to patenting abstract ideas, not implementations of these ideas. This is not just dangerous for progress, business and innovation. It&#8217;s nonsensical. Take a look at this article from ArsTechnica. US 5,796,967 &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/10/24/patently-insane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A recent review of the Community Patent process</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/09/29/a-recent-review-of-the-community-patent-process/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/09/29/a-recent-review-of-the-community-patent-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pointers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/09/29/a-recent-review-of-the-community-patent-process/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some informative articles by the The Register on the state of the negotiations for establishing a common legal system for establishing patents and governing litigation across the EU. See this. Also on The Reg, this article about how damaging the U.S. system is to FOSS.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/09/29/a-recent-review-of-the-community-patent-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s JPEG &#8216;replacement&#8217;: The Unifier?</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/05/26/microsofts-jpeg-replacement-the-unifier/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/05/26/microsofts-jpeg-replacement-the-unifier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/05/26/microsofts-jpeg-replacement-the-unifier/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is late in releasing a proprietary, closed, image format, but it certainly got there. Much as with WMA and WMV, Microsoft has long endeavoured a lock-in by virtue of media formats. Is the WM Photo format more of the same? Do we really need it? Is it going to spell the beginning of Microsoft&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/05/26/microsofts-jpeg-replacement-the-unifier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Union Copyright Directive</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/02/27/european-union-copyright-directive/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/02/27/european-union-copyright-directive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 03:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/02/27/european-union-copyright-directive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is less than a year since the European Software Patents law was finally defeated in the European Parliament, after a long and troubling history with the European institutions. This article is about the EUCD (European Union Copyright Directive), the European version of the U.S. DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act). This controversial law aims to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cosmix.org/2006/02/27/european-union-copyright-directive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The EU Patents review process restarts&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2005/02/03/the-eu-patents-review-process-restarts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cosmix.org/2005/02/03/the-eu-patents-review-process-restarts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2005/02/03/the-eu-patents-review-process-restarts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, go there and read this. Apparently : Brussels, 2 February 2005 &#8211; The Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament (JURI) has decided with a large majority to ask the Commission for a renewed referral of the software patents directive. With only two or three votes against and one abstention, the resolution had overwhelming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cosmix.org/2005/02/03/the-eu-patents-review-process-restarts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM to open 500 of their patents to the public.</title>
		<link>http://blog.cosmix.org/2005/01/11/ibm-to-open-500-of-their-patents-to-the-public/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cosmix.org/2005/01/11/ibm-to-open-500-of-their-patents-to-the-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cosmix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pointers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cosmix.org/2005/01/11/ibm-to-open-500-of-their-patents-to-the-public/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM may not be any different to any other corporation &#8212; ironically it used to be the ‘bad guy’ 20 years ago &#8212; they announced that they will be opening 500 of their patents to the open source community, ensuring that open source developers will be free to use their technologies without paying any royalties.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cosmix.org/2005/01/11/ibm-to-open-500-of-their-patents-to-the-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

