Tag google

DroidDraw

Android Logo (small)A first attempt at creating a visual UI designer for Android. While not exactly sophisticated compared to more mature visual UI design tools, it greatly simplifies the task for designers (cf. programmers). Worth a look for anyone interested in developing for Android.

Nokia's Future.

I just read this article on The Register about Nokia’s view of the future of mobile phones, Web 2.0, mobile internet etc. I generally like Nokia, they’ve managed to overcome their long-established image as a relatively small, insignificant player from Finland and turned themselves into the goliath of mobile phones in less than a decade. […]

Exploring Android: Preliminaries

Android is out and it seems pretty well designed. This is the first of what’s hopefully going to be a series of articles covering Android from cosmix.org. It’s also going to be the least technical in nature as I haven’t had much time to play around with it and also because introductions should rarely be […]

Dalvik: The new name of Sun's worst nightmares.

An excellent article about Java on Android, Sun's licensing trickery, Google's checkmate the slanted meaning of Openness. A must read. Also read this for a retrospective view of the open sourcing of Java one year ago.

The Pin Project

Ένα από τα πλέον ενδιαφέροντα και χρήσιμα ελληνικά έργα στο διαδίκτυο που αφορά τους περισσότερους από εμάς. Για χρόνια σκεφτόμασταν με κάποιο φίλο να φτιάξουμε κάτι παρόμοιο αλλά φαίνεται πως μας πρόλαβαν. :) Πρακτικά αποτελεί ένα web application βασισμένο στο Google Maps που επιτρέπει στους χρήστες να ορίσουν επικίνδυνα σημεία στους δρόμους της Ελλάδος. Δεν είναι πλήρες, ούτε έχει εξαντλήσει πολλές από τις ιδέες που είχαμε (π.χ. δημιουργία layers με ορθόγονη πληροφορία, π.χ. πόροι, έργα, σημεία κινδύνου κλπ., περισσότερες/πολλαπλές κατηγορίες, όπως χαλασμένα φανάρια, διπλά σήματα κ.α.) όμως είναι πολύ καλοφτιαγμένο και αξίζει την υποστήριξή σας. Αν γνωρίζετε οδικά σημεία που παρουσιάζουν επικινδυνότητα στους οδηγούς ή πεζούς 'καρφώστε' τα στον χάρτη! Ελπίζω πως εν καιρώ οι υπεύθυνοι φορείς (δήμοι, νομαρχίες, υπουργεία κλπ.) θα δώσουν τη πρέπουσα σημασία. Όπως και να έχει μια δημόσια υπηρεσία όπως αυτή ακυρώνει πολλές από τις δικαιολογίες που συχνά ακούμε.

FakeStevey got it…wrong.

Check this post by Fake Steve Jobs. It's hilarious and not just because it nails what the real Steve Jobs probably thinks of Openness, but also because it highlights what was always wrong with his approach: whenever his companies were weak (NeXT in the late 80s and early 90s, Apple in the late 90s and early 2000s) he touted Openness, standards and formed alliances with other companies. Take Adobe's Display PostScript in NeXTSTEP, Darwin, Display PDF, OpenGL, OpenAL, CUPS, UNIX certification, gcc and a number of other standards, APIs, libraries and applications between 2001 and today in OS X or his 'agreement' with Microsoft in 1997. But just when things do well, he tries to usurp the dominant position, showing complete disregard to their partners, development community, users and sometimes even employees. In my discussions about Android with friends over the past day I compared Google with Microsoft in the 80s. Many have done the same. This comment by 'chickenface' in the linked article is, I believe, representative of how I see Android evolving and eventually dominating the market:
This is 1984, the iphone is the 128K Mac, and GPhone is the PC. Look, there's no actual consortium; there's Google and its customers. Kinda like Apple and AT&T, but they've got so many customers we're calling it a consortium. When're you gonna get this straight: Microsoft were like the Klingons - we made a sort of peace with them and held our nose. Google, they're way worse -- they're the Borg.

The MetaSocial

Yahoo! seems to have yet another social networking site in the works, after the failed 360° and the still in beta mash. Its name is Kickstart. This new network seems to position itself somewhere between LinkedIn and the original Facebook, trying to map student relationships and match them to employer requirements. I really fail to […]

Android and the Open Handset Alliance.

Apple may have produced a great, polished and closed device in the iPhone. Revolutionary? Nope, but very impressive nevertheless. As a device, as a user interface and — soon — as a platform. Yet in some years from now, what will probably be the iPhone’s single most significant contribution to the world was the belief […]

Google Earth οι μεν, Lonely Planet οι δε.

Διαβάζω στη Καθημερινή [μέσω buzz] πως μέλη των Ταξιαρχιών Μαρτύρων του Αλ Ακσά δηλώνουν ανοιχτά πως κάνουν χρήση του Google Earth "προκειμένου να εντοπίσουν τους στόχους των αυτοσχέδιών τους ρουκετών". Kαι σχεδόν ταυτόχρονα διαβάζω το εξής άρθρο στο BBC News το οποίο συνοδεύεται από απόσπασμα video [RealPlayer] του νέου ντοκυμαντέρ του BBC 'No Plan, No Peace' στο οποίο δηλώνεται 'ανοιχτά' από την ταγιεροφορούσα συνταξιούχο εδώ και μια τριετία Αμερικανίδα διπλωμάτη, Barbara Bodine, πως οι αμερικάνοι χρησιμοποιούσαν έναν τουριστικό οδηγό Lonely Planet (ω τι ειρωνία!) των αρχών της δεκαετίας του 1990 ώστε να προγραμματίσουν τη κατοχή της χώρας. Δε ξέρω τι με τρομάζει περισσότερο...

Advertising Googlocrisy.

Here's a pretty good reason why you shouldn't trust companies, even if their 'motto' is 'Do No Evil': Google seems to be penalising sites that carry paid links, while at the same time AdSense has become one of the most ubiquitous ad-schemes around. Technology aside, whether you carry paid/text links or AdSense is the same thing: advertising on your page. Google's algorithmic dependency on hyperlinks to determine content quality and relevance is nothing but it's own problem and while they can do whatever they want to their engine it kind of reflects bad on them (see abuse of market position) to penalise sites this way, especially when they run an extensive ad service too. Think of Microsoft doing the same for all pages carrying AdSense because their engine used Javascript created links to determine the page rank of a site. People would be crying foul before the bytes had settled on the press release (and they'd be right of course). Now, think of Microsoft having anywhere near the search engine market share that Google has and I'm sure someone would probably be contemplating a class action lawsuit about lost visits, profits etc. due to unlawful discrimination. Will people blink first by removing paid links and sticking to Google's ad services out of fear of losing traffic, or will the company end up losing market share in the long term as a consequence of mediocre search results and annoyed users?