Tag Linux

Just The Same, If Not Worse

The OLPC project started with the best intentions of bright people. It got hyped beyond reason, first by some of its leaders (viz. Negroponte), then by gullible politicians and — at another level — by gullible idealists that failed to see what was in front of them. Throughout its history the OLPC was flawed; flawed […]

Boxee Invites.

One of the most promising open-source projects regarding the home-theatre/TV (at last!) that combines excellent æsthetics, killer media features and social networking is Boxee. Boxee is based on the XBMC project. Note that while this is alpha quality software, it's impressively stable, yet unsupported. Boxee is currently available for the AppleTV/Mac OS X, Ubuntu Linux 32bit - 7.10 and 8.04 only at the moment - and in source code form. I've got some invites for the invite-only alpha testing phase, so if you're interested drop me a comment below and I'll send you one. Update: No more invites here, comments are now closed. I'm sure you can find some elsewhere pretty easily.

Delusions.

Hmmm, what was Mark thinking when he wrote this? The warrior rabbit is our talisman as we move into a year where we can reasonably expect Ubuntu to ship on several million devices, to consumers who can reasonably expect the software experience to be comparable to those of the traditional big [software vendors]: Microsoft and […]

Did we really release 8.04?

The question serves as the subject of the eponymous thread on the ubuntu-devel mailing list. And it's quite valid. I'm really saddened to see the flawed argument put forward by several Ubuntu developers that 8.04 was a right decision. Even today, more than two months since 8.04 was released and some days after 8.04.1 came out, with hundreds of megabytes of updates the problems affecting 8.04 are numerous, major and extremely annoying. We still have a long way to go before reaching parity with the best (viz. OS X), let alone surpassing it. Judging by the responses on that thread, the first step would need to be the end of the state denial as a defence mechanism, acknowledging the fact that the 8.04 release (as well as 8.04.1) were full of show-stopper bugs and reminiscent of an era when desktop linux was infinitely more annoying than it is today and working towards quality (cf. punctuality). A 'release' should translate to 'usable, polished software', not 'alpha quality developer preview software'. 8.04 seemed more like the latter than the former and that needs to change.

Five GNOME/Linux Desktop Issues

GNOME, one of the two main linux desktop environments and platforms has become a very popular choice adopted by most major distributions as their desktop of choice, mostly due to its simplicity and minimalist design. While it does several things ‘right’, by generally providing a straightforward experience and ‘hiding’ advanced configuration options in its gconf […]

10 Days to Hardy and GNOME's ugliness.

Following on from my earlier post on the upcoming Ubuntu 8.04 ‘LTS’ release, I fear that my prediction, albeit harsh, was pretty accurate: Ubuntu 8.04 LTS should have never been branded as a Long Term Support (LTS) release. Despite the obvious shortcomings of having β-quality software (Firefox 3.0, GVFS) and new frameworks that — statistically […]

How Hard could fixing 'Hardy' be?

Ubuntu 8.04 is coming on the 24th of April 2008. As is typically the case in the past few years, many millions of Ubuntu users across the globe are either waiting or, in some cases, trying out the pre-release software, reporting and fixing bugs. Beta 1 of the upcoming version of this popular linux distribution came out a few days ago and, sadly, despite the fact that 8.04 is an LTS (Long Term Support) release, it seems that it's going to be --- by far --- one of the buggiest releases ever to come out bearing the name 'Ubuntu'. In my tests with 'Beta 1', there are hundreds of major bugs involving the brand new (and largely unstable) gvfs subsystem for GNOME, application compatibility with PulseAudio and general system behaviour, responsiveness and stability. Having said all that, Ubuntu 8.04, at least in its first Beta is significantly faster than its predecessor. Having less than a month before the 'final' comes out begs the question: is Ubuntu 8.04 going to be delayed so that it matches 7.10 in terms of stability (remember this is supposed to be a Long Term Support release), or is it going to be released on time with a x.xx.1 version coming later in the year? Why has Canonical abandoned the 'few things at a time, done properly' approach that it long had with Ubuntu since the beginning? While desktop linux is still sorely lacking the usability foundations that would enable it to compete with OS X, stability was never one of its problems; unless 'Beta 1' represented a codebase quite far from what Canonical is working on for release --- sadly this is not the case --- Ubuntu 8.04 is probably going to be a feature-rich update, but a huge disappointment in the areas where linux traditionally shines.

A plan that will mandate the use of open standards and open source software government-wide

Say the Dutch. And that's excellent news. Government is perhaps the foremost market segment where open source can thrive, evolve and gradually be positioned so as to make inroads in the enterprise. Holland plans to be running open software by mid 2008 at a national (central government) level and 2009 for local and state organisations. Interestingly, according to The Register, the bill was not opposed in parliament, despite Microsoft's protests; on the other hand, I'm sure that many in the Netherlands may be somewhat frustrated by this, although in the longterm I'm sure they'll appreciate the difference. The message is clear: Open Up or be excluded. Who's next?

Exploring Android: Preliminaries

Android is out and it seems pretty well designed. This is the first of what’s hopefully going to be a series of articles covering Android from cosmix.org. It’s also going to be the least technical in nature as I haven’t had much time to play around with it and also because introductions should rarely be […]

Injury to Insult.

One of my main annoyances with OS X since 10.0 was Terminal.app. My UNIX background requires a decent terminal application and Terminal.app more or less traditionally embodied everything that can possibly be wrong with a terminal application. Up until Leopard, Apple had paid little attention to it and many people had forsaken it for applications such as iTerm. Sadly I never quite liked iTerm, I don't fancy starting X11 up just for the terminal and so I ended up tolerating Terminal.app and hoping that Apple would fix it in the future. I couldn't --- and still can't --- understand how Gnome and KDE provide so much more powerful terminal applications and Apple, the goliath of usability and design, provides such a ridiculous terminal. Or can I? In Mac OS X Leopard, Apple revamped its terminal application. Unfortunately the revamp is nothing but insulting to those people that are most probably going to be using it the most. One of the longstanding issues with the previous versions was the inability to set the ANSI colours so that coloured text could be legible under dark or light backgrounds. In 10.5 Apple has introduced several 'themes', including a number of dark themes provided by the company, (viz. 'Pro'), that use dark backgrounds. Yet actually using those themes is practically impossible with the OS X default ANSI colours and there's no way to change these colours: they are still hard-coded in the binary. The usual solutions are still there, using InputManagers, SIMBL etc. or giving up on Terminal.app and switching to another terminal application, yet so is my dislike for any of those solutions. Given the work that Apple has clearly put in providing the 'theming' functionality --- including a wholly new configuration system and theme inspector it's quite perplexing why they 'omitted' providing support for setting the ANSI colours given that it's been one of the most commented upon, criticised omissions of this application for the past six years. If anything it seems to me like Apple is taunting its users with such ridiculous 'improvements' and the completely needless attention to detail (e.g. 'live' thumbnails on the terminal inspector!), while it ignores real problems faced by those that make use of its software.