Inception (2010)

Inception movie posterThe Thirteenth Floor. Existenz. The Matrix. Movies that more or less, in their respective segments, defined a time, set a trend. That was 1999 and while the first two movies became ‘cult’, mostly due to their lower budgets and respective promotion, the latter ended up being a megahit that drew praise from geeks, critics and philosophers alike, before the writers decided to sell out and botched the story and the universe they created with two poor sequels.

One basic premise of all of those films was the multi-layered existence of the characters, their ability to ‘live’ in mulitple worlds; usually, for the sake of audience comprehension, those worlds were limited to two: the ‘real’ world and a virtual one. A mechanism for moving between these two ‘worlds’ was presented and it always had to do with technology (technology being an easy way to ‘explain’ the impossible without going into much detail). Christopher Nolan could not have escaped the effect that those movies had, when he first imagined Inception in 2001, just a year after Memento, a film he directed and co-wrote, was met with great acclaim. Originally imagined as a horror film, Nolan decided to film Inception as a heist movie instead and this ended up being one of the most important decisions he could have made.

‘Inception’ is a ‘product’ of that first generation of Hollywood productions involving the multi-level existence of the protagonists, but it goes a step further: it marries a complex concept — that of a thief stealing ideas from people while they are dreaming — with masterfully simplified narration, intense action employed as a plot device, as opposed to an entertainment feature of the film, and a superficial, underdeveloped but fundamental to the story backdrop of human emotion. This movie is a brilliantly engineered hollywood blockbuster, rather than a cinematic masterpiece. Great entertainment, it ultimately lacks the originality, the depth, the masterful storytelling that would propel it to levels beyond those of a blockbuster; Action, emotion and scientific/philosophical components are amply sprinkled in support of an average story aimed to satisfy almost everyone watching it.

For those accustomed to brainless Hollywood films, Inception may seem brilliantly nuanced and complex. On the contrary, those trapped within the cinephile, high-brow notions of classic european films, will probably find the marriage of uncelebrated action to a deeper, more complex and, above all, ’emotional’ setting acceptably thrilling. In the end Inception is a film designed to be liked by the majority of its audience; and that is perhaps its greatest flaw, for it could have been a rare example of great contemporary cinema instead of a polished blockbuster for the masses.

3 Responses to “Inception (2010)”

  1. Nikos Kouremenos says:

    Exactly. Nolan should have tried to avoid Blockbuster (for once). Or maybe the movie could have been 1,5 hour. Avatar has its blockbuster segment in the end (10 minutes) when the bad guy can’t die.

    In Inception as soon as we land in the ice area (and we here the inside joke “couldn’t he dream of a better place?”) we understand it’s time to go home [if we’re Europeans] and let the McDonald generation kill each other.

    The movie is 2,5 hours and I’m sure I’ve heard loud music ALL THE TIME. That is also VERY VERY frustrating. US filmmakers should kill the violins and the drums and let the silence or the acting speak.

    Only in the end we can see some trick “is he still dreaming or not” but that’s not enough.

    For DiCaprio it’s time to play another role (it was already obvious after Shutter Island) for Nolan next time get the money and do one movie every 10 years

  2. Panagiotis Atmatzidis says:

    I did not see the movie yet, but I surely will after reading the article. I thought that it was a mainstream blockbuster at first glance… Apparently there’s more.

  3. atma says:

    I found the movie quite difficult and boring. Although the concept is interesting there are too many ‘blind spots’ that I can’t accept axiomatically.

Have your say.

Write in the language of the post. Comments are meant to encourage on-topic discussion. For general comments, observations, complaints (e.g. about the site), you can use the form found in the Contact page. Make sure you've read the Terms of Use before commenting.

Comments Feed for this post Comments Feed for this entry.