2011.10.26

KF8. The path to fragmentation.

Amazon announced Kindle Format 8, a new format for ebooks destined for its popular ebook reader. The new format, based on html5, promises books with small file sizes, excellent rendering performance, varying typefaces, tables and, in general, much more complex layouts and as a result way more beautiful books than the standard experience typically found in today’s mobi books — there is already another format, azw4/topaz, another format supported by the kindle that also allows ‘custom’ typefaces, but is riddled with other deficiencies, among them being bitmap based.

Leaving aside the complication for ebook publishers, and the remedies thereof, the main problem with kf8 is that Amazon has already made it clear that it is destined for only the fourth generation of Kindles (including the Kindle Fire tablet, which is the first device that will see kf8 support) and not any of the previous generations. Some might argue that the issues are technical, but given that the latest Kindle with Keyboard seems to be essentially a rebadged Kindle 3, I don’t really buy that. Amazon is playing an Apple card here, intentionally crippling older devices that would be perfectly capable, after a firmware upgrade, to render ebooks in kf8.

If my numerous assumptions above are valid, I think that they are wrong to choose this path of content fragmentation. A few years ago people bet that Amazon would be giving away Kindles to members of its prime programme in the U.S. and, eventually, everyone. With dwindling net profits, moves such as this, the general realisation of the limits and drawbacks of ebooks by the general public, especially when they are DRMed, it’s easy to think that even a company that successful can drop the ball. Somehow I feel that Amazon needs to copy Apple’s drop of FairPlay, open up and start playing nice(r) if it wishes to turn its excellent headstart into a longlasting dominance of the market.

comments


» Web 2.0 was “interface” level people trying to solve “infrastructure” level problems

While flawed in some of its comparisons, the article rings so painfully true and accurately depicts the lunacy of the post bubble renaissance of the web industry.

comments

» Advertising Googlocrisy.

Here’s a pretty good reason why you shouldn’t trust companies, even if their ‘motto’ is ‘Do No Evil’: Google seems to be penalising sites that carry paid links, while at the same time AdSense has become one of the most ubiquitous ad-schemes around. Technology aside, whether you carry paid/text links or AdSense is the same thing: advertising on your page. Google’s algorithmic dependency on hyperlinks to determine content quality and relevance is nothing but it’s own problem and while they can do whatever they want to their engine it kind of reflects bad on them (see abuse of market position) to penalise sites this way, especially when they run an extensive ad service too. Think of Microsoft doing the same for all pages carrying AdSense because their engine used Javascript created links to determine the page rank of a site. People would be crying foul before the bytes had settled on the press release (and they’d be right of course). Now, think of Microsoft having anywhere near the search engine market share that Google has and I’m sure someone would probably be contemplating a class action lawsuit about lost visits, profits etc. due to unlawful discrimination.

Will people blink first by removing paid links and sticking to Google’s ad services out of fear of losing traffic, or will the company end up losing market share in the long term as a consequence of mediocre search results and annoyed users?

1 comments

Download Spinalonga's Podsafe rock music for your podcast. From Athens, Greece, with love.'