The depth of everything that’s involved
JBQ’s writings on Dennis Ritchie’s death find me in total agreement and are worthy of a citation. dmr was a legend and his contribution, concise as meaningful, simple yet immensely powerful, has — and still does — shaped computing (and much of modern life) as we know it. C may not be ‘modern’ anymore, it may have been relegated to systems programming, high performance libraries and embedded computing for the most part, but it is still an immensely powerful tool, a foundation upon which countless other technologies have sprung since the late 70s. UNIX, once considered a dying breed still powers, in the form of Mac OS X and Linux, the vast majority of smartphones, most servers connected to the internet and numerous other devices, from printers, to desktops, to routers.
It is hard for a non-technologist to comprehend dmr’s contribution as it is for a technologist to overstate it.
Once you start to understand how our modern devices work and how they’re created, it’s impossible to not be dizzy about the depth of everything that’s involved, and to not be in awe about the fact that they work at all, when Murphy’s law says that they simply shouldn’t possibly work.
For non-technologists, this is all a black box. That is a great success of technology: all those layers of complexity are entirely hidden and people can use them without even knowing that they exist at all.
[...]
That is why the mainstream press and the general population has talked so much about Steve Jobs’ death and comparatively so little about Dennis Ritchie’s: Steve’s influence was at a layer that most people could see, while Dennis’ was much deeper. On the one hand, I can imagine where the computing world would be without the work that Jobs did and the people he inspired: probably a bit less shiny, a bit more beige, a bit more square. Deep inside, though, our devices would still work the same way and do the same things. On the other hand, I literally can’t imagine where the computing world would be without the work that Ritchie did and the people he inspired. By the mid 80s, Ritchie’s influence had taken over, and even back then very little remained of the pre-Ritchie world.
Goodbye Steve.
It took less than an hour before most of the world’s mainstream (and alternative) media posted their canned obituaries. This time it’s for Steve Jobs; his death a long time coming. Feared, loathed, inspiring and adored like few of his contemporaries, he led a life full of contradiction; from his early Buddhist ideas and bohème life, his romanticism and artistic side to product design to his unflinching strategy and vision, his ruthless management style, his arrogance, his passion and obsession with quality and detail, his epic turnaround of a company on the brink of bankruptcy to the most successful company on this planet. In a market of diminishing margins, ever deteriorating quality, commoditisation and the unbearable mediocrity of the PC industry, he dared to think different [sic] and proved that there is a better way.
Steve Jobs was not a saint, a ‘genius’ or a ‘brilliant’ inventor as many like to call him. His policies, his ideas, his ego, his intelligence were not unmatched when considered individually. He was, however, unique in that he combined all those traits that make for legendary leadership, exceptional performance and product creation: an extremely charismatic, visionary man with just the right amount of wit, vision, passion and stubbornness to effect significant change whatever he put his mind to. He had a keen eye and an obsession for quality, lovable and inspiring products and the strength of character to go above and beyond the protocols and limits dictated by the market to create and sell them. He also had an uncanny ability to gather great people around him to execute his strategy and vision; people that are, in the end, those whose work embodies all that is Apple, all that is Pixar. And he delivered as leader of a company more so than almost anyone in the past fifty years. And for that, and the products and services he helped create — the progress he seemingly forced upon the all encompassing, yet pathetic industry that computing has become — he will be sorely missed. For, sooner or later, in a world so dependent on technology, his absence will be felt, well beyond Apple and its community.
Goodbye Steve.
Steve Jobs image courtesy of Apple Inc.
» Naïve Brilliance
If anything can be said in retrospect about Robert McNamara is not that he was hawkish, evil, corrupt or duplicitous, but that despite his sophistication, the statistical prowess and scientific rigour that he showed in his work, his all-around intellectual capacity (or perhaps, in a way just because of all these) he exemplified the naïve brilliance that often accompanies highly intelligent people that fail to take that macroscopic view and consider where they place their focus and energy and why they do so. His 2003 ‘apology’ film, the Errol Morris documentary ‘The Fog Of War’, as well as his 1995 ‘In Retrospect’ book, both indicate that wisdom came late to McNamara; a clear and very welcome difference, nevertheless, to most of his contemporaries.
Oscar Peterson, one of the great Jazz pianists of the latter half of the 20th century and a marvellous pianist in general, died today. I was first exposed to his work by listening to Eloquence. My last musical encounter of his work was his 1994 album Side by Side, with Itzhak Perlman, a record full of covers of old american classics, recorded in a few days, without rehearsals and mostly consisting of the first takes. His death is a huge loss to the jazz community and a reminder that his generation, those largely responsible for what jazz is all about, is gradually passing away.
Goodbye Professor.
This Friday I was informed that a member of my research group at Imperial and a friend, Professor Patrick Purcell passed away. I last saw him this past December while visiting London and, despite our efforts, we did not manage to meet, but for a few minutes in some corridor at the university. Our meeting was to be postponed for early this year, when I’d be back in London. Alas, it was not meant to be.
Patrick was one of those people that you rarely find in academia today. A true gentleman, an academic from a different era, that did not equate intellectual creation with grants, money, piles of publications. A researcher without the rigid training and sterile approach favoured by large umbrella project grants and the commercialisation of research. He was an artist trapped in an engineering faculty and a very helpful friend to many of us graduate students. He had academic experience in both Europe and the U.S. (he was a member of the Architecture Machine Group at MIT and later a founding member of the Media Lab, then its incarnation in Europe, and two other research laboratories) and as such possessed a very spherical view of what academia is throughout the (western) world. We had long and varied discussions over the years about academic values and principles, intellectual creation, art, technology, society and philosophy. Despite his old age (he once jokingly told me that he had retired about seven times) he kept on coming into university regularly, working long hours editing books and journals. Academia was — very evidently — his life. This year he was planning to finally (really) retire.
When I met Patrick, about four years ago, I remember informing him about the death of Roger Needham, for whom I had written in my blog. I had met Roger Needham some months earlier at a seminar at Cambridge and Patrick had told me how they had met each other as members of a number of steering groups and committees. Patrick then commented: “It is so saddening that when you get old you get to see all your friends and acquaintances of your generation pass away; suddenly you feel so alone.”
Four years later I find myself writing a similar post about Patrick and feeling so alone, indeed. Goodbye Professor. You’ll be missed.
Update: Sunny Bains has prepared a blog where people can share their memories and stories about Patrick, here.
Update 2: The Obituary at the Times


