Foreign Objects Prohibited
If there's ever going to be any sign of a fledging high technology defence industry in China, that'd be it. Building the Chinese Empire step by step.
Category Pointers
The Kindle and the 1970s.
Electronic Paper was invented at Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center (sic) in the 1970s. In 2007, Amazon, one of the largest online retailers in the world and probably the only corporation capable to even think of trying this given the combination of its vast inventory, business relationships to the publishing industry and technological know-how, made the first large commercially viable attempt at bringing it to the masses. I don't know if the Kindle
, as it's called, is going to succeed or not (I can already think of a number of problems with it), but the idea of an electronic book becoming a reality seems fascinating. If only it didn't look like a prop from a 1970's sci-fi TV show...
The product and associated service are only available in the U.S. for the time being. Europe is a technically much more difficult market: as the device is using 3G broadband, and more specifically EV-DO, it will need to be modified to use the 3GSM/UMTS variant, HSDPA. Then, Amazon would need an agreement with the cellular network operators in the countries it's planning on launching the product/service before it could become an even remote possibility. And that's not counting the publishing rights on each country etc. My guess is that, if the Kindle comes to Europe by Amazon, it's probably going to be limited to the UK, Germany and France. The other problem, of course, is the lack of WiFi. With mobile internet rapidly becoming the norm, the choice of 3G networking might not prove to be a good one in the long run, no matter what Jeff Bezos thinks.
, as it's called, is going to succeed or not (I can already think of a number of problems with it), but the idea of an electronic book becoming a reality seems fascinating. If only it didn't look like a prop from a 1970's sci-fi TV show...
The product and associated service are only available in the U.S. for the time being. Europe is a technically much more difficult market: as the device is using 3G broadband, and more specifically EV-DO, it will need to be modified to use the 3GSM/UMTS variant, HSDPA. Then, Amazon would need an agreement with the cellular network operators in the countries it's planning on launching the product/service before it could become an even remote possibility. And that's not counting the publishing rights on each country etc. My guess is that, if the Kindle comes to Europe by Amazon, it's probably going to be limited to the UK, Germany and France. The other problem, of course, is the lack of WiFi. With mobile internet rapidly becoming the norm, the choice of 3G networking might not prove to be a good one in the long run, no matter what Jeff Bezos thinks. Olá Apple
Εδώ και μια πενταετία αρκετοί χρήστες Mac προσπαθούν να φέρουν την Apple πιο κοντά στις, ως επι το πλείστον, παραμελημένες από αυτή χώρες τους. Μέχρι πρότινος χώρες όπως η Ιταλία, η Ρωσία αλλά και η Πορτογαλία παρέμεναν εκτός του δικτύου της Apple. Η Ιταλία απέκτησε το δικό της Apple Store πέρυσι. Φέτος, το Μac OS X Leopard κυκλοφόρησε με πλήρες localisation στα Ρώσικα εντός του διεθνούς retail πακέτου και τώρα η Πορτογαλία αποκτά το πρώτο, δικό της (δικτυακό) κατάστημα Apple, η πρώτη επίσημη παρουσία της εταιρίας στη χώρα --- έστω και μέσω διαδικτύου. Και στα δικά μας.
Robot Guitar ('Someone Kill The Marketing People')
So after the digital pickups now Gibson is releasing an auto-tuning guitar. Great. This does seem like a big deal and I do like it that Gibson is trying to pair modern technology with high quality craftsmanship and vintage design, yet the name, website and associated marketing videos are utterly ridiculous. Do they really think that guitarists are 8 year old retards that would find this kind of promotional material appealing? Ok, they clearly do. Are they? :)
The marketing literature even goes as far as comparing the future value of this limited edition auto-tuning LesPaul to that of a number of legendary guitars including the 1959 Standard; what a sacrilege! The overall presentation goes a long way against maintaining Gibson's respectable image among musicians.
Still, when the limited run disappears and this becomes a standard feature of Gibsons I'm sure many people will be happier. I know I would if I had one.
Image courtesy of Gibson Guitar Corporation.
Dalvik: The new name of Sun's worst nightmares.
An excellent article about Java on Android, Sun's licensing trickery, Google's checkmate the slanted meaning of Openness. A must read. Also read this for a retrospective view of the open sourcing of Java one year ago.
The Pin Project
Ένα από τα πλέον ενδιαφέροντα και χρήσιμα ελληνικά έργα στο διαδίκτυο που αφορά τους περισσότερους από εμάς. Για χρόνια σκεφτόμασταν με κάποιο φίλο να φτιάξουμε κάτι παρόμοιο αλλά φαίνεται πως μας πρόλαβαν. :)
Πρακτικά αποτελεί ένα web application βασισμένο στο Google Maps που επιτρέπει στους χρήστες να ορίσουν επικίνδυνα σημεία στους δρόμους της Ελλάδος. Δεν είναι πλήρες, ούτε έχει εξαντλήσει πολλές από τις ιδέες που είχαμε (π.χ. δημιουργία layers με ορθόγονη πληροφορία, π.χ. πόροι, έργα, σημεία κινδύνου κλπ., περισσότερες/πολλαπλές κατηγορίες, όπως χαλασμένα φανάρια, διπλά σήματα κ.α.) όμως είναι πολύ καλοφτιαγμένο και αξίζει την υποστήριξή σας. Αν γνωρίζετε οδικά σημεία που παρουσιάζουν επικινδυνότητα στους οδηγούς ή πεζούς 'καρφώστε' τα στον χάρτη! Ελπίζω πως εν καιρώ οι υπεύθυνοι φορείς (δήμοι, νομαρχίες, υπουργεία κλπ.) θα δώσουν τη πρέπουσα σημασία. Όπως και να έχει μια δημόσια υπηρεσία όπως αυτή ακυρώνει πολλές από τις δικαιολογίες που συχνά ακούμε.
Injury to Insult.
One of my main annoyances with OS X since 10.0 was Terminal.app. My UNIX background requires a decent terminal application and Terminal.app more or less traditionally embodied everything that can possibly be wrong with a terminal application. Up until Leopard, Apple had paid little attention to it and many people had forsaken it for applications such as iTerm. Sadly I never quite liked iTerm, I don't fancy starting X11 up just for the terminal and so I ended up tolerating Terminal.app and hoping that Apple would fix it in the future. I couldn't --- and still can't --- understand how Gnome and KDE provide so much more powerful terminal applications and Apple, the goliath of usability and design, provides such a ridiculous terminal. Or can I?
In Mac OS X Leopard, Apple revamped its terminal application. Unfortunately the revamp is nothing but insulting to those people that are most probably going to be using it the most. One of the longstanding issues with the previous versions was the inability to set the ANSI colours so that coloured text could be legible under dark or light backgrounds. In 10.5 Apple has introduced several 'themes', including a number of dark themes provided by the company, (viz. 'Pro'), that use dark backgrounds. Yet actually using those themes is practically impossible with the OS X default ANSI colours and there's no way to change these colours: they are still hard-coded in the binary. The usual solutions are still there, using InputManagers, SIMBL etc. or giving up on Terminal.app and switching to another terminal application, yet so is my dislike for any of those solutions.
Given the work that Apple has clearly put in providing the 'theming' functionality --- including a wholly new configuration system and theme inspector it's quite perplexing why they 'omitted' providing support for setting the ANSI colours given that it's been one of the most commented upon, criticised omissions of this application for the past six years. If anything it seems to me like Apple is taunting its users with such ridiculous 'improvements' and the completely needless attention to detail (e.g. 'live' thumbnails on the terminal inspector!), while it ignores real problems faced by those that make use of its software.
PayPal Everywhere?
I have to admit I'm not a huge fan of PayPal as it has more than its fair share of security issues, but I occasionally use it as it is convenient. Nevertheless, in the past few days I've noticed that several 'major' online stores have added PayPal as a payment option. Take for example HP or Native Instruments. Several international online retailers (e.g. Expansys or Pixmania), have had a PayPal payment option for a long time and many smaller retailers take advantage of the company's streamlined services.
I am not sure what the demographics of the service's users are, but I'm quite certain that users in several European countries are not really big customers of PayPal. My personal experience with it has been generally good, with the exception of one time when I tried using it for a relatively large amount and ended up having my card deactivated for a few days --- banks don't seem to like PayPal much. Yet its adoption as a payment option in the online stores of large corporations may signify that it's becoming an accepted alternative to bank payment processors, a manifestation perhaps of the e-currency theories of the 1990s. What do you think?
FakeStevey got it…wrong.
Check this post by Fake Steve Jobs. It's hilarious and not just because it nails what the real Steve Jobs probably thinks of Openness, but also because it highlights what was always wrong with his approach: whenever his companies were weak (NeXT in the late 80s and early 90s, Apple in the late 90s and early 2000s) he touted Openness, standards and formed alliances with other companies. Take Adobe's Display PostScript in NeXTSTEP, Darwin, Display PDF, OpenGL, OpenAL, CUPS, UNIX certification, gcc and a number of other standards, APIs, libraries and applications between 2001 and today in OS X or his 'agreement' with Microsoft in 1997. But just when things do well, he tries to usurp the dominant position, showing complete disregard to their partners, development community, users and sometimes even employees.
In my discussions about Android with friends over the past day I compared Google with Microsoft in the 80s. Many have done the same. This comment by 'chickenface' in the linked article is, I believe, representative of how I see Android evolving and eventually dominating the market:
This is 1984, the iphone is the 128K Mac, and GPhone is the PC. Look, there's no actual consortium; there's Google and its customers. Kinda like Apple and AT&T, but they've got so many customers we're calling it a consortium. When're you gonna get this straight: Microsoft were like the Klingons - we made a sort of peace with them and held our nose. Google, they're way worse -- they're the Borg.
Leopard UI flaws
Apple likes showing off. In Leopard lots of things are improved, the UI is more consistent and polished. Yet there are a number of completely ridiculous aspects of it that go quite a long way towards demolishing Apple's reputation as a leader in UI design. Take for example the new Dock, which besides completely pointless is also an ergonomic nightmare, heavy on resources and ugly. Did I mention pointless? (Thanks to the_unknown_Apple_dev for the no-glass option!).
The linked blog entry more or less sums up most of the things I found completely, utterly stupid while looking at Leopard images and videos online. I've got some more, such as the relatively dark gray 'platinum' look (I prefer the lighter gray of the 'inactive' windows), CoverFlow (mostly useless in the Finder if you ask me), the proliferation of etched text among others. [via daring fireball]
Update: As usual, a really good and thorough review of Leopard by John Siracusa, can be found at ArsTechnica.