It’s not as if any government anywhere (let alone the European Commission) ever preempted technological innovation and successfully regulated it, before it even became reality. Take for example what happened with Biofuel in the EU. Or renewables. Or, as a matter of fact, the ‘net itself. So it actually begs the question: What on earth were the (seemingly clueless) bureaucrats that drafted this press release thinking when they coined their own pointless buzzword (as if there aren’t enough already) in ‘Web 3.0′ and proceeded in presenting their equally pointless milestones and grand vision, when the EU funding for broadband has rivalled Gore’s Information Superhighway in waste, frivolousness and incoherence?

In spite of the lack of substance in the press release, there are some good parts in the related Commission report, The Future Networks and the Internet. Nope, it’s not the internet of ‘things’ or ’stimulating investment in high-speed broadband’ or — ironically — ‘building the net of the future’. Instead I found keeping the ‘net open and guaranteeing availability to be the most useful (and realistic) of the themes presented in the report. In any case, thinking about the future is commendable and could prove extremely wise; the way the Commission attempts to achieve it seems completely wrong and betrays ignorance of how and why technology such as the ‘net can have such a disruptive effect in society (hint: yep, lack of regulation definitely had something to do with it).

A public consultation on the ‘early challenges of the Internet of Things’ is open until the 28th of November.

Η Forthnet ξεκίνησε τη παροχή ενός LLU πακέτου με μόνον απεριόριστη ADSL πρόσβαση στο διαδίκτυο (διατίθεται και τηλεφωνική γραμμή αλλά χωρίς πάγιο. Οι κλήσεις κοστίζουν.), ονόματι Forthnet ADSL Economy. Αν μετακόμιζα και έπαιρνα νεα γραμμή, εφ’όσον είχα εξασφαλίσει πως θα είχα σταθερό κύκλωμα ADSL^*, μάλλον θα το επέλεγα, δεδομένου του ότι κάνω το 99% των κλήσεων μου μέσω VoIP ή/και κινητού. Ενδιαφέρον.

* Σε πάρα πολλές περιπτώσεις τα κυκλώματα ADSL είναι αρκετά ασταθή λόγω α. απόστασης από το DSLAM, β. κακής καλωδίωσης εντός κτηρίου ή/και του ΟΤΕ και (δυστυχώς) γ. κακών ρυθμίσεων των DSLAM από τους παροχείς. Εαν κάποιος σκοπεύει να χρησιμοποιήσει μια γραμμή ADSL για VoIP τηλεφωνία είναι απαραίτητη η εξασφάλιση μιας σταθερής γραμμής πριν την επιλογή ενός data-only πακέτου.

Time for a humorous break. Check this 1980s French Apple Computer Inc. television advertisement. It shows an old wealthy businessman showing his company’s assets to his son (?) in their luxury automobile while explaining that all this will become his, but he should make the decisions alone because his workers should not think, but only execute as they cannot handle making decisions and should just stick to following orders. The ad ends with the narrator saying that “this is one way to run a company, but fortunately there are others”, at which time the apple logo fades in.

And this is why for so long so many people thought Apple was an elitist, out of touch company. For many years its products were mostly appealing (in terms of price and marketing strategy) to people exactly like the old man: elitist and wealthy.

If the ad were from the late 1970s/early 1980s (before Jobs left), it’d probably be a snipe at IBM — the ‘evil’ giant of the time that only had mainframes and micros and dismissed personal computers as toys. Or equally, those that didn’t think personal computers could increase the productivity of their workers. In which case it’d make some sense, but still be be laughably ironic, for Jobs’ own managerial style is probably more authoritative, selfish and hierarchical than any (based on what’s been written about him in numerous books, articles etc.) and would probably make the old man look like an egalitarian-supporting socialist running a cooperative business and making as much as everyone else. But, according to Gruber, the ad came out after Jobs left. It makes little sense: the alternatives to the Mac in the mid to late 1980s, a time of so much competition and so many different architectures and offerings, were more affordable, generally equally productive (at least given the software that was out for a significant part of the tasks people performed at the time) and were definitely accompanied by less arrogant, more pragmatic marketing campaigns, while IBM was clearly far from the all-mighty player in the industry it was half a decade earlier. [via daringfireball.net]

Heh, if that article is even slightly accurate, I’d be very surprised if Myspace didn’t try to do everything in its power to satisfy indie labels and bands. Without them it stands no chance of surviving. None at all, even if it had all four major music megacorps behind it. The competition is so much better and Myspace is mediocre if not poor an implementation.

After consistently denying it for months, Comcast just admitted they were throtlling a number of protocols since 2007. After FCC ordered them to abandon the practice in early August, they admitted to throttling traffic using a Sandvine Policy Traffic Switch 8210. The company stated they are going to change the way they manage their network by 2009. According to Comcast spokewoman Sena Fitzmaurice “The new technique does not manage congestion based on the protocol or application a consumer uses. This new technique will ensure that all customers get their fair share of bandwidth every hour of the day”.

In my view they are lying and greedy and if FCC was doing its job right they should have been fined considerably high for others not to imitate them. Their admission comes almost 45 days after the FCC ruling and proves how much regulation is required to keep greedy businesses in line. Regarding their upcoming ‘network management’ policy, I’m somewhat puzzled. In particular, I’m not quite sure how they’ll ensure a fair share of bandwidth without selective throttling (or any other classification technique that would — again — violate the Net Neutrality rules), unless they radically change their offering to a quota-based range of offerings, place relatively low speed caps on everyone for sustained connections or increase their network bandwidth by an astronomical amount. We’ll see.

Update: ArsTechnica seems to have the details. Apparently the system is going to be use ’shallow packet inspection’ and packet-counting triggers for throttling. It does seem ridiculous and completely unacceptable, given that many legitimate applications actually depend on high packet throughput to function properly (VoIP is a good example here). Of course, without first seeing how this works in practice it’s hard to judge it, but either way either the FCC will stomp on them once again or the system is going to function without enough disruption to Comcast’s (sad) subscribers.

The people behind the best HTML engine around (yep, that’s WebKit for those that don’t know it yet) just announced the next generation of their new Javascript engine, SquirrelFish Extreme, just a few months after SquirrelFish itself was announced and before it was even adopted in any product. In the performance chart they posted in the linked page the engine is around 3 times faster than JavascriptCore and two times faster than SquirrelFish. Impressive.